skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Huckabee? Really?
| Giuliani | 34% | 27% | 28% | 24% | 30% | 27% | 24% | 24% | 25% | 21% |
| Huckabee | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 3% | 4% | 6% | 6% | 21% |
| McCain | 30% | 23% | 24% | 20% | 14% | 13% | 14% | 14% | 12% | 18% |
| Romney | 7% | 12% | 8% | 10% | 10% | 16% | 9% | 15% | 21% | 16% |
| Thompson | ni | 9% | 6% | 15% | 17% | 16% | 23% | 16% | 17% | 6% |
*Results from American Research Group, may be off by 4%In recent telephone samples gathered from some 600 republicans (all of which have pledged to vote) Mike Huckabee is now, amazingly, tied for first. In march of this year he was pulling in at a little under 1%...So is Giuliani still going to get the nomination or should he be watching his back?
2 comments:
For the record those polls start in march and go to December
Perhaps most amazing is that Huckabee has only spent $300,000 in Iowa, as opposed to Romney's $7 million, most of which is his OWN money.
Guess money isn't everything when you're a Mormon Republican Candidate.
Any comments on Romney's religious speech this week?
Post a Comment